Baseball’s Greatest Hitters of the ‘90’s
Keith R. Thompson,
May 4, 1999
Few sports have experienced more pendulum-like swings than Baseball in the 1990’s. First there was the strike of 1994, that ate away the World Series for the first time ever (not even World Wars I & II could have done that). Then there was the resurrection, so artfully spearheaded by Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa, that once again transfixed the sport among the upper echelons of America’s favorite pastimes. The pendulum has swung yet again. As the decade and the millennium come to a close it is once again a poignant time to stop and reflect on the game’s greats. Just who were the great players of the past decade.
To start the analysis I consider the active career batting average leader Tony Gwynn. He batted an incredible .344 in the decade of the 90’s (thus far) and needs just 72 more hits to become only the 21st player in major league history with 3,000 base hits. Along-side him I include Frank “The Big Hurt” Thomas who is the active leader in On Base and Slugging Percentage, and the only player in major league history to have amassed 100 RBIs, 100 Runs, 100 Walks, and a 300+ average for seven consecutive
seasons. Then there is the indomitable Barry Bonds, the three-time MVP of the National League who also has driven in more runs than any other player this decade. Following him I considered Ken Griffey Jr., the man most consider the best possible bet to eventually unseat Hank Aaron for the all-time home run crown. To complete the analysis I also included Albert Belle and Juan Gonzalez, two of the most feared hitters in baseball the past few years, and Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa, who provided so much thrill for us last season, when baseball was experiencing it’s rejuvenation.
Below is a look at their decade-long statistical performances, and how they compare against each other:
Player Ave. OBP SLG G AB R H 2B 3B HR
T. Gwynn 0.344 0.388 0.476 1162 4570 685 1574 303 33 78
F. Thomas 0.321 0.443 0.584 1236 4406 894 1416 281 10 286
B. Bonds 0.305 0.438 0.600 1332 4539 1000 1385 279 40 327
K. Griffey Jr. 0.304 0.383 0.582 1248 4771 879 1449 271 27 334
A. Belle 0.300 0.373 0.586 1175 4466 773 1339 308 15 314
J. Gonzalez 0.292 0.340 0.572 1080 4209 671 1229 243 18 300
M. McGwire 0.266 0.408 0.602 1068 3481 673 926 150 0 340
S. Sosa 0.265 0.318 0.498 1189 4481 700 1186 174 33 269
Player RBI TB BB K HBP SH SF SB CS SB%
T. Gwynn 626 2177 360 174 10 11 56 90 38 70.3
F. Thomas 963 2575 989 675 32 0 74 25 15 62.5
B. Bonds 993 2725 1073 685 42 1 57 328 92 78.1
K. Griffey Jr. 957 2776 612 793 38 5 50 127 46 73.4
A. Belle 982 2619 518 756 42 4 65 69 31 69.0
J. Gonzalez 940 2408 287 825 44 0 46 18 12 60.0
M. McGwire 809 2097 818 899 50 2 42 9 5 64.3
S. Sosa 787 2233 339 1151 31 12 30 210 86 70.9
Gwynn lead the group in Hits and Batting Average, but his anemic .476 Slugging Percentage indicated that he was more of a singles hitter which certainly didn’t help his team’s cause, considering that they compiled only a 49% winning record over the decade. In fact, three of the players played on teams which had a sub-500, including McGwire and Griffey. McGwire himself lead the group in Home Runs and Slugging percentage, but considering that those leads came from only one season’s performance (1998) then McGwire’s performance must be put into its proper context, a fantastic season, but not much else. Sosa’s performance can also be placed into a similar light. His 1998 performance was a career year in almost every statistical category (except of course strike outs, he just missed that record by three). But that performance of his would have been a career year for almost any other player in history, so Sosa’s ’98 performance cannot therefore be considered when assessing the player of the decade. He also had a woeful 48.5% winning percentage with his Cubbies team over the decade. Gonzalez also had a very productive decade, driving in more runs per game than any other player during that stretch. However his on base
percentage was not very encouraging, and proved that he was a very one dimensional player. That therefore leaves four players: Albert Belle, Barry Bonds, Ken Griffey, Jr. and Frank Thomas for serious player of the decade considerations.
Player Team Win %
B. Bonds 54.59%
F. Thomas 53.31%
A. Belle 51.19%
J. Gonzalez 51.15%
S. Sosa 50.22%
M. McGwire 49.42%
K. Griffey Jr. 49.32%
T. Gwynn 49.03%
To better analyze which of these players deserves this very illustrious crown of player of the decade I utilized the Player Efficiency Rating Analysis (or PER for short) which I had created in 1996. This PER Baseball methodology attempts to measure a Baseball hitter's and pitcher's performance relative to plate appearances and innings pitched respectively. It is a very comprehensive analysis as it assesses a hitter's complete performance at the plate, on the bases, and in the field, and a pitcher's complete performance on the mound. To put the analysis in perspective, batting average does not currently measure the player with the most hits in the league, but rather the player with the most hits per at-bat. This because all players do not have equal plate appearances, nor equal opportunities to perform. Likewise, a pitcher’s ERA is not intended to measure the amount of earned runs he allows, but rather the number of earned runs per innings pitched, reflecting the fact that all pitchers do not have comparable innings pitched. However, when it comes to other aggregate statistics such as RBIs, Home Runs, Stolen Bases, etc. , we still measure player performances without regard to
the number of plate appearances that those players have. The PER changes all that. Firstly, it considers all statistics relative to plate appearances or at-bats to determine the better performers, then it combines all of these statistics into one intuitive formula to determine who had a better overall performance. It does not isolate batting average from RBIs or Runs Scored, or any other relevant statistical category. Instead it combines them all to arrive at a figure that most truly reflects that player’s performance over the course of the season.
The concept of a
Batting Player Efficiency Rating (or Batting PER) is developed which comprises a player's
Run Contribution Average, and
Earned Bases Average.
Run Contribution Average (RCA ) comprises Total Runs Scored plus Runs Batted In, less total Home Runs, divided by Total Plate Appearances. This is an important statistic since the object of any game is to score runs and win. As such RBIs is not considered any more important than runs scored, neither is it considered any less. Any runner who is on base needs someone to drive him home (or in very rare instances he can steal home), and barring a home Run a hitter at the plate needs someone on base in order to register an RBI. So Runs scored and Runs Batted In are considered equal for purposes of the PER Analysis. An RCA of .250 or higher indicates a good run producer, while an average of at least .300 indicates a hitter is an efficient run producer.
Earned Bases Average (EBA) comprises Total Earned Bases (which is nothing more than Total Bases produced by the Hitter, plus total Bases on Balls, and total Stolen Bases) divided by total plate appearances plus total steal attempts. This is the single most important statistic of a hitter since it measures all facets of his performance: hits (measured by total bases), walks drawn, and stolen bases, and compares it against every time he is at the plate or attempts a steal. His overall baseball skills is therefore fully assessed, and a true measure of his greatness is established. An EBA of greater than .600 indicates a great batsman and base runner, while a .700 or higher EBA indicates a premier batsman and all-time great Hitter.
Batting Average is the standard construct analyzing Hits per At-bats. A higher average (generally over .300) indicates a very efficient hitter.
The three concepts of Batting Average, Run Contribution Average, and Earned Bases Average are then combined in a very intuitive formula (and adjusted for a hitter's total plate appearances) to determine his Batting PER. As such, this is the single best measure of a baseball hitter's overall performance since it measures his average, power, speed and run production, all combined in one statistic.
The following analysis provides an excellent vantage point to determine the best player of the ‘90’s.
Run Earned Total On
Batting Batting Contribution Bases Earned Total Base Slugging
Player PER Average Average Average Bases Bases Ave. Percentage
B. Bonds 92.89 0.305 0.295 0.679 4126 2725 0.438 0.600
F. Thomas 92.04 0.321 0.289 0.656 3589 2575 0.443 0.584
K. Griffey Jr. 87.54 0.304 0.277 0.628 3515 2776 0.383 0.582
A. Belle 86.01 0.300 0.286 0.625 3206 2619 0.373 0.586
J. Gonzalez 81.21 0.292 0.289 0.594 2713 2408 0.340 0.572
T. Gwynn 80.84 0.344 0.249 0.517 2627 2177 0.388 0.476
M. McGwire 79.17 0.266 0.262 0.670 2924 2096 0.408 0.602
S. Sosa 74.06 0.265 0.250 0.539 2782 2233 0.318 0.498
Despite Frank Thomas' unprecedented start to his baseball career and Tony Gwynn's voluminous batting titles, it is Barry Bonds, as determined by the PER who is the most dominant player in the decade of the ‘90’s. He leads all players in most RBIs, most Runs Scored, most Extra Base Hits, most walks and his teams in Pittsburg and San Francisco posted the highest winning percentage of any player in this select group. Barry Bonds, the player of the Decade of the 90s.
© 1999 PER Sports, Inc.
Have a comment on this article.
Send an email to us via
Articles by Keith Thompson
Does the NFL's first-round playoff bye benefit the top teams?
The Limitations of the current Quarterback rating System
What’s wrong with the OPS analysis in baseball
A Critique of the Amateur Player Draft in Professional Sports
Critiquing the Playoff Selection and seeding process in pro sports
Time for a new ‘Super’ League in European Soccer
Europe's best football teams
Which Soccer League is tops in the World
A Big East - Big Ten
College Football Realignment Proposal
Time to Fix College Football's Flawed Championship
The 2004 Baseball MVP Race
Baseball's Greatest Hitters of the 1990s
The 1998 Baseball MVP Race
Democracy for the Famous: Critiquing Baseball's '98 All-Star selection process
Will Wilt Chamberlain Be Denied Number 3, Again?